Discover Nikkei

https://www.discovernikkei.org/en/interviews/clips/1200/

The lawsuit set the standard for restoring people’s rights

There are a number of reasons why I think the lawsuit is beneficial, and I won’t remember them all right now, anyway. They might come up as we talk.

A couple of them, first of all, defines what redress is, in terms of the injuries, the twenty-two causes of action, and the remedy, the amount that we were asking, which came to about twenty-seven, twenty-eight billion dollars. So it set a standard. The statement of injuries is very important, because the legislation doesn’t do that. [It] doesn’t define injuries. It doesn’t state what they are. My own feeling is that if you had to state the injuries the legislation would have never passed, because Congress does not like to put the government in the position of having to admit to error. So Congress just deals with the bottom line—what it’s going to cost, how the thing is going to be implemented, how much are we going to pay people, and so forth, on various levels of this thing, and the time frame—all that stuff—and the impact on the rest of the government. So the lawsuit was important in setting the standard.

It also was important in the sense of—I felt it was very important because it put us in an adversarial relationship—Japanese Americans versus the United States. And that was something that was new to us. We never had been in that situation. We had always been loyalists. You can almost summarize the Japanese experience up till then, anyway, in this one term—loyalty. Here we were taking the United States of America to court. I think that was, at last, the appropriate relationship for us to have. There was nothing nasty about it. We weren’t trying to brutalize the United States (laughs) or abuse the United States. We were just seeking what our rights were under the law, but we also wanted the United States to be held accountable. I think that was maybe one of the important things, as far as restoring the proper relationship between ourselves and our government. It’s something that is not just Japanese Americans that have to learn that. There are a lot of people that have to learn that. That’s what I think the last second half of this century has been about—the restoration of people’s rights in relationship to the government, and civil rights, and feminists, and gays, and everything else, trying to establish a healthier relationship. I think that that’s been very positive. I think it was very important for Japanese Americans to do that, too.


civil rights lawsuits Redress movement

Date: June 12, 1998

Location: California, US

Interviewer: Darcie Iki, Mitchell Maki

Contributed by: Watase Media Arts Center, Japanese American National Museum

Interviewee Bio

In 1927, William Hohri was born the youngest of six children in San Francisco, California. Following the outbreak of World War II, he and his family became incarcerated at Manzanar concentration camp in California. A week after his high school graduation, Hohri was released from camp to study at Wheaton College in Wisconsin. In March 1945, Hohri attempted to visit his father in Manzanar and was instead imprisoned for traveling without a permit. Hohri was given an individual exclusion order and forced at gunpoint to leave California by midnight that same day.

Later, Hohri became a member of the Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), but was disappointed with their disregard to the anti-war and Civil Rights movements. When JACL moved towards supporting a congressional commission to study the concentration camps, a group of Chicago and Seattle dissenters led by Hohri formed the National Council for Japanese American Redress in May 1979, seeking redress through direct individual payments. Initially, Hohri and NCJAR worked with Representative Mike Lowry (D-Washington), but when the resolution was defeated, Hohri and NCJAR redirected their efforts to seek redress through the courts. Hohri, along with twenty four other plaintiffs, filed a class-action lawsuit on March 16, 1983, against the government for twenty-seven billion dollars in damages.

He passed away on Nov. 12, 2010 at age 83. (November 2011)

Minami,Dale

Role of the redress movement in helping Nisei to open up about their wartime experiences

(b. 1946) Lawyer

Minami,Dale

Impact of the original Korematsu case on current events

(b. 1946) Lawyer

Minami,Dale

Reflections on the importance of history

(b. 1946) Lawyer

Embrey,Sue

Changing Minds

(1923–2006) Community activist. Co-founded the Manzanar Committee

Embrey,Sue

Prevailing Within the System

(1923–2006) Community activist. Co-founded the Manzanar Committee

Embrey,Sue

Fighting For What’s Right

(1923–2006) Community activist. Co-founded the Manzanar Committee

Miyatake,Henry

Evolving History

(1929 - 2014) One of the earliest proponents behind the redress movement.

Kinoshita,Cherry

Need for Monetary Compensation

(1923–2008) One of the leaders behind the redress movement.

Kinoshita,Cherry

Erasing the Bitterness

(1923–2008) One of the leaders behind the redress movement.

Hosokawa,Bill

From Reparations to Redress

(1915 - 2007) Journalist

Hosokawa,Bill

The Strength of Evidence

(1915 - 2007) Journalist

Irons,Peter

Learning About the Internment

(b. 1940) Attorney, Coram nobis cases.

Tomihiro,Chiye

Duties of the Witness Chair

Chaired the Chicago JACL's Redress Committee.

Tomihiro,Chiye

Too Ashamed to Tell

Chaired the Chicago JACL's Redress Committee.

Tomihiro,Chiye

What to Do Next

Chaired the Chicago JACL's Redress Committee.